Thursday, April 23, 2009
Coop Work on Saturday
Friday, April 17, 2009
Tour de Coop in Ft. Collins
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Re-design list of tasks
• Chicken-wire the bottom
• Secure the doors
• Nesting box door entrance, creation of nesting boxes
• Lateral Support (against wind, make secure to ground)
• Staining/Sealing of wood
• Enclosed run/Fenced-in Run
Mining Shack
• Re-size to fit into BMoCA
• Change/remove gray box on top?
• Integration of run—underneath possibly?
• Secure against predators
• Making it more accessible for the owners to clean and remove boxes
False Front
• Create Nesting Boxes
• Create roosting area
• Integration of Run?
• Window installation
• Screen door behind main door
• Pitch the roof and secure it
• Add top to the front
• Make sure it is secure
• Make a new false front, the original broke in the take down process
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Monday, April 13, 2009
Thoughts from last week
Thoughts for BMoCA space
- Do shacks all need to be connected to one major run? Can there be multiple small runs? Seems a bit overwhelming when all is tied into one space
- Should there be a specific “children’s area” spot in the sculpture area? Or is this taking the project out of the realm of sculpture and making it into something other than what we want?
- Can eggs be sold from our chickens at the farmer’s market? Perhaps with a particular stamp on them? Perhaps a display outside encourages people to walk inside.
- Architecture kit—maybe sold at Design within Reach and the Farmer’s Market
- Omelette bar???? Don’t know. Sounds messy
- Two brochures—or perhaps double sided brochure—one that tells about the artistic context, one that talks about getting hens into back yards
- Chickens there every Saturday, but only accessible by viewing. No human/chicken interaction. (Disease, harm to the chickens…)
- Live feed from interior of chicken shacks—“chicken cam” so you can check what is going on inside.
- Floor protection for BMoCA?? Straw maybe not enough.
- Video from Marcy maybe not in same space as chickens—instead out in entryway so that people can hear it and become curious.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Context (Santiago Pass)
Context (Yolanda)
In the interdisciplinary spirit of Baseline Group, we have the inevitable need to create collaborations and to move towards creating community-based art. We are interested in involving community members within the building process, as well as reach out to the community through educational components provided throughout our exhibit. The mission of Chicken Shack Village to heighten awareness about raising hens in an urban setting is a vehicle in which Baseline Group can create a seamless and active connection between art and community.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Context (Cobb)
The CSV incorporates architecture, environmental concerns, and social practice within the world of art. The chosen aesthetics of our shacks evolved after researching Boulder’s history, investigating its vernacular architecture, and it’s relationship to Colorado’s regional identity. Through the context of art we hope to start a conversation regarding the integration of chickens in urban environments and by proposing alternatives to city dwellers.
Context (Bockelman)
In light of this, the Baseline Group researched the vernacular architecture of Colorado in preparation for creating designs for the chicken shacks. What we chose included references to the historical architecture of Colorado such as that of the mining shack and false fronted building. However, we also chose to emphasize the current architectural trend to use reclaimed materials in chicken shacks that feature a specific material like a shipping pallet or a door.
By becoming immersed in local culture and architectural aesthetic, the Baseline Group hopes to understand and strengthen its connection to the community in which it works.
Monday, April 6, 2009
Context (Schnirel)
Chicken Shack Village inter-mingles art, design, architecture, and the social/political to create functional sculptures that serve the community. The project generates dialogue surrounding the introduction of chickens in a backyard environment. Our group’s comprehensive investigation into Boulder’s vernacular and regional aesthetic influences many of our design decisions. However, we remain aware of the urban chickens’ concept functioning outside Boulder, Colorado and in other communities.
Questions surrounding the taxonomy of the work need not be ignored. We position ourselves in the genre of sculpture; however we derive strength from other fields like service art (a medium that provides for the community), new genre, and public art. Our multifaceted approaches to the artistic process and our diverse backgrounds allow for a constructive conversation for the direction of Chicken Shack Village.
An ongoing awareness to pertinent sustainable solutions also influences the Villages design. In an environment full of Greenwashing and proposed alternatives, we find ourselves utilizing practical ideas that leave less impact, promote stronger local economies, and demote carbon-based fuel demands. Although we merely implement backyard egg production, the resounding affects are an amazing environmental improvement to both the backyard aesthetic and the Boulder identity.